SR&ED Common Mistakes: Why Claims Get Rejected and How to Avoid Them
SR&ED is a self-assessed program. Most claim failures cluster around the same set of mistakes — documentation gaps, mischaracterized work, and financial inconsistencies that CRA reviewers know to look for.
Mistake 1: Describing the Solution, Not the Uncertainty
What it looks like: "We developed a machine learning model to predict customer churn. The model achieved 89% accuracy."
Why it fails: This describes the outcome, not the uncertainty. CRA wants to know what you didn't know before you started.
Fix: Rewrite every narrative from the perspective of the engineer at the start of the project, not the engineer looking back at a success.
Mistake 2: No Contemporaneous Documentation
CRA reviewers ask for records created during the work.
What counts: Git commit messages, Jira tickets describing the problem, Slack threads where engineers discuss failed approaches, sprint retrospective notes mentioning technical blockers.
What doesn't save you: A retrospective SR&ED documentation spreadsheet created in month 12.
Fix: When an engineer hits a genuine technical unknown, they create a ticket. It describes the uncertainty, the approaches tried, and the outcome. Ten minutes per issue, worth thousands per engineer per year.
Mistake 3: Claiming Routine Development
Commonly misclassified as SR&ED: - Integrating third-party APIs - Standard database schema design - Building CRUD applications or admin interfaces - Performance optimization with well-known techniques (adding a cache layer) - Implementing algorithms that already exist in published form
The test: Could a skilled contractor with standard professional knowledge solve this in a reasonable timeframe? If yes, it's probably not SR&ED.
Mistake 4: Weak Time Allocation Records
What gets challenged: Round-number allocations with no supporting evidence. Allocations that don't align with the project descriptions. No records at all.
Fix: Use sprint data, issue trackers, or time-logging tools. A spreadsheet correlating project tickets to work periods is defensible if internally consistent.
Mistake 5: Missing the 18-Month Filing Deadline
SR&ED claims must be filed within 18 months of the end of your fiscal year. There are no extensions. Companies that miss this window lose the claim permanently.
Mistake 6: Claiming Foreign Employee Costs
Only work performed in Canada by Canadian employees or arm's-length Canadian contractors is eligible. Non-Canadian employees do not qualify.
Mistake 7: Paying 25–30% to a Contingency Consultant
A $400,000 claim with a 30% contingency fee costs you $120,000. For that money, you funded someone else to document your own work.
The contingency model made sense before AI-assisted platforms existed. For first-time or routine claims, use a platform. Keep a consultant on retainer for audit support only.
---
The SR&ED program rewards documentation discipline more than it rewards brilliance. The companies that recover the most started tracking what they were doing from day one.
Ready to verify your eligibility for sred?
Use our Enterprise Intelligence Engine to instantly cross-reference your corporate profile against latest government funding parameters.
Interested in further strategic intelligence?
Contact our advisory board for deeply customized funding pathfinding and enterprise capital strategy.